Magazine_logo
Large_left_arrow Large_right_arrow

GOP hopefuls tackle LGBT rights

Alternate TextNext year, the White House is up for grabs. The GOP is trying to figure who they want to run against President Obama. While the economy is the most talked about topic, the candidates are weighing in on same-sex marriage as well.

Here’s a roundup of what the frontrunners are saying:

Rick Perry
The current Texas Governor has sent mixed messages on his stance regarding gay marriage.

Infamously, he was caught on camera saying, “There is still a land of opportunity, friends — it’s called Texas. We’re creating more jobs than any other state in the nation. … Would you rather live in a state like this, or in a state where a guy can marry a guy?”

When he knows people are listening, he’s supported gay rights, but not same-sex marriage. He said he would support a federal ban on gay marriage, which appears to contradict his prior assertion that states should pass their own laws defining marriage.

In his 2008 book “On My Honor,” he wrote: “Even if an alcoholic is powerless over alcohol once it enters his body, he still makes a choice to drink. And, even if someone is attracted to a person of the same sex, he or she still makes a choice to engage in sexual activity with someone of the same gender.”

Mitt Romney
The former Massachusetts Governor definitely has a history of being gay friendly. In his prior runs for public office, he ran on platforms supporting gay rights.

Romney maintains he is in favor of gay rights, but echoes the competition in being anti-same-sex marriage. When accused of flip-flopping, he said his views remain unchanged. Same-sex marriage was never on the table, so he had not weighed in until now. He contends that if gay marriage had been an issue in the past, he would not have supported it.

At a recent town hall in New Hampshire, he said, “What I would support is letting people who are of the same gender form, if you will, partnership agreements. If they want to have a partnership with someone else and have, as a result of that, such things as hospital visitation rights and similar benefits of that nature."

Newt Gingrich
The former Speaker of the House is no friend to the LGBT community. He’s made no bones about it.

In 2009, he told Fox News, “I think there is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us, is prepared to use violence, to use harassment. I think it is prepared to use the government if it can get control of it. I think that it is a very dangerous threat to anybody who believes in traditional religion."

True to his values, he maintains the stance the homosexuality is a sin. He would under no circumstance be in favor of same-sex marriage, though he’s a huge fan of heterosexual marriage, indulging himself three times so far.

Herman Cain
The former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza and Gingrich share the same views on same-sex marriage.

Like Gingrich, Cain has stated he would not support marriage rights for same-sex couples as he believes homosexuality is a sin and in traditional family values.

He has further stated he would try to pass a ban on gay marriage. He thinks being gay is a choice.

Michelle Bachmann
One of the more talked about opponents of gay marriage is Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota.

In 2003 and 2005, she led an effort within the Minnesota Legislature, which if passed, would have barred the state of Minnesota from recognizing same-sex marriages.

In September, Bachmann appeared on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” to reaffirm her belief that marriage is between a man and woman. She said she would oppose any effort to expand the rights of marriage to same-sex couples.

Bachmann has been a consistent opponent of same-sex marriage. Her beliefs are religiously driven. She told KKMS radio in 2004 that same-sex marriage “is an earthquake issue. This will change our state forever. Because the immediate consequence, if gay marriage goes through, is that K-12 little children will be forced to learn that homosexuality is normal, natural and perhaps they should try it.”

Rick Santorum
Like the rest of his fellow GOP candidates, the former Pennsylvania Senator has stated he is not in favor of same-sex marriage.

His statements regarding the right to marry have been considered the most outrageous when compared to his fellow GOP hopefuls. Santorum has argued that passing legislation allowing lesbian and gay people to marry would lead to the United States having to legalize things like marrying animals, bigamy and incest.

While Romney seems to be the most tolerant of the LGBT community, he still has his limits.  Based on the above positions from the GOP one thing is clear, should a Republican win the White House in 2012, the LGBT civil rights movement may hit a wall.

 

ADDITIONAL ARTICLES

Luke Evans Is Out - Then In

Zachary Quinto Needs Our Help

Hollywood Duke: The Celluloid Closet

Wilson Cruz: Devoted to Helping Gay Teens

Out and Proud: Velez-Mitchell Makes Headlines

Glee's Bad Girl Goes Gay

Daniel Radcliffe Talks Gay Marriage 

Actor Chad Allen's Coming Out Story - In His Own Words

How to Come Out of the Closet  



Comments
Comment by Jim Hamilton
7 months ago

It is always surprising to find out that all republican candidtaes are bisexual. Obviously, if being gay is a choice, they must have had same sex feelings, but just chose to be straight. It amazes me how stupid people are.

Comment by Bill Hansen
7 months ago

I'm always surprised when people make the "its a choice argument."

Here's a funny John Stewart clip with Mike Huckabee (note:

www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-december-9-2008/mike-huckabee-pt--2

7 months ago

Being a gay republican, I just can't stomach the two facedness of the Dems on this issue. When they are pressed by the media they will "double speak" their face off, and when the dust settles they really haven't said a bloody thing. They want to appear to be on our side so they can get our vote. I hope that if a national bill supporting our right to marry lands on the desk of a Republican president, I think it would stand a greater chance of being signed into law, then a dem who would first ask "How will this play in Peoria". But bottom line is that this is a states issue, the fed should not be involved at all. It will be a long battle, we will win in the end.

Comment by Brock George
7 months ago

Couldn't have said it better Denny so I won't try. I will, however, add that people on the right, such as myself, often have a harder time being accepted in the gay community as being on the right than we have being accepted by people in the right as being gay. Back in 1993 I was treasurer of College Republicans and the head of the gay group at my university, and no one in College Republicans had a problem with that. The Left is only two-faced on the issue for people who don't pay attention. Obama's reaction to the Prop 8 decision in California by Chief Judge Walker was no surprise to me, but an alleged "complete shock" to groups like HRC. And while I'm no fan if HRC and all of their double-talk, I also don't think they're stupid, which means I find it hard to believe they missed every reference Obama and Biden made against same-sex marriage during the campaign. If we want to have a shot at having equal rights for same-sex partners, we have to (a) drop the battle over nomenclature and focus the battle on actual rights and (b) keep it at the state level. Marriage hasn't been an issue for the federal government since there's been a federal government, and we want a shot at equality, we have to keep it that way.

Products
The Wordless Web: An experiment of Imagery
Politics
Same-sex marriage rights recognized in Rhode Island
Daily Roundup
LGBT News Roundup 05.15.12
Poll_balloon
Could a pro-gay Romney beat Obama?
 
Yes
 
No