429 Magazine

Gay couple seeking right to jointly adopt in Germany, case dismissed on a technicality

The Constitutional Court of Germany dismissed a case seeking to grant same-sex couples the right to jointly adopt children on a technicality. LGBT rights activists are maintaining that the same court issued a ruling in February 2013 that effectively allowed such rights.

Conservative politicians, including Chancellor Angela Merkel, have been accused of deliberate inaction regarding LGBT rights, instead leaving issues to the judges of the Constitutional Court.

Though Germany does not have marriage equality, same-sex couples have had access to registered partnerships since 2001, which provide nearly all of the same rights as marriage, including immigration sponsorship and adoption of stepchildren, although they still lack joint adoption rights. As of a 2013 court ruling, gay and straight couples must also be treated equally with regards to taxation laws.

In February 2013, the Constitutional Court expanded same-sex couples’ stepchild adoption rights to the adoption of a child that one’s civil partner has already adopted, a practice called “successive adoption.”

Germany’s Lesbian and Gay Association released a statement expressing its regret that the court declined to issue a ruling, but said that prior rulings make it clear that the court does support equal rights for the LGBT community.

The statement read in part, according to the Chicago Tribune, “Parliament and the government cannot hide behind this formal rejection of the case. The ban on joint adoption by civil couples is effectively meaningless, as partners can circumvent it by adopting a child in succession. This is even possible in the same hearing.”

A previous court ruling declared that a ban on joint adoption only applied to same-sex couples was in violation of the principle of equal treatment, and gave the government until July 2014 to make a change; the left-right coalition under Merkel has promised they will.

The reason given for the rejection was that the case was not thoroughly grounded in the relevant legal arguments.


Written By:
Morgan Welch
Morgan Welch
Fri, Feb 21, 2014
Comment by tips88
3 months ago
Comment by Maicer
2 months ago

A Bathing Ape has you covered this 2016 fall/winter for those days when the sun’s glare is just too much to handle. In true streetwear fashion, the mega Japanese label is releasing its upcoming ray ban outlet eyewear collection with designs that include camo patterns and polarized lenses. There’s a versatile mix of pared-back frames and even wilder ones to suit whatever outfit you might be donning for the day. Clear-lensed options are also available for those who want to take on a more dapper appearance. Titanium is by far one of the most popular metals featured in luxury replica watches sale today. The metal’s lightweight characteristics, durability and hypoallergenic qualities are factors to consider when selecting a timepiece, not to mention essential elements for your watch collection.

People are Busting a Gut Over the OUT Milo Yiannopoulos Profile
Dispatch from San Francisco: Transparent Season 3 Premieres at the Castro
Glass Act: A Look at Luminaire Showroom's 'Glaslove'
Do you own your own business?
Trying to